| | 70 | The gray curve shows the membrane potential excursion in response to an |
| | 71 | input spike arriving at the neuron at t=1.5ms (left panel, the right panel |
| | 72 | shows an enlargement at low voltages). The amplitude of the post-current |
| | 73 | has an unrealistically high value such that the threshold voltage for spike generation is |
| | 74 | crossed. The membrane potential is recorded in intervals of 1ms. Therefore the first |
| | 75 | non-zero value is measured at t=2ms. The threshold is crossed somewhere in the |
| | 76 | interval (3ms,4ms], resulting in a voltage of 0 at t=4ms. The membrane potential |
| | 77 | is clamped to 0 for 2ms, the refractory period. Therefore, the neuron recovers |
| | 78 | from refractoriness somewhere in the interval (5ms,6ms] and the next non-zero |
| | 79 | voltage is observed at t=6ms. The black curve shows the results of the same model |
| | 80 | now integrated with a grid constrained simulation scheme with a computation step size |
| | 81 | of 1ms. The input spike is mapped to the next grid position and therefore arrives at |
| | 82 | t=2ms. The first non-zero voltage is oberved at t=3ms. The output spike is emitted |
| | 83 | at t=4ms and this the time at which the membrane potential is reset. Consequently, the |
| | 84 | model neuron recovers from refractoriness at exactly t=6ms. The next non-zero |
| | 85 | membrane potential value is observed at t=7ms. |